Evvu  Electric Vehicle adoption decision‑support App

How might we let drivers find out whether an electric car fits their real life needs?

My role

Founder. I took Evvu from MSc thesis to a shipped product, owning the design workstream end to end, from research and opportunity framing to prototyping and delivery. I also built the business model and wrote the financial plan.

Team

Nicola Notarnicola - Service and UX/UI design
Vincenzo Lanera - Dev. back‑end
Giuseppe Scorrano - Dev. front‑end

Timeline

2022 to 2024

Evvu app screens showing the range of a chosen electric car next to the driver's own trips, beside the question: does an electric vehicle suit you?

Activities

  • Opportunity framing and problem definition
  • Quantitative data analysis
  • UX/UI design and lean startup validation
  • Business modeling

Deliverables

  • Published iOS and Android App
  • GPS‑based EV digital‑twin patent
  • Business plan and market sizing
  • Investor and partner pitch deck

Outcomes

What started as an MSc thesis became a functioning startup: an app live on the App Store and Google Play, an I3P incubation, and 3 startup awards.

Problem and context

Transport accounts for about a quarter of Europe's greenhouse‑gas emissions, and passenger cars for roughly 72% of that. Decarbonising the private fleet is the fastest available lever, and the electric vehicle (EV) is the most viable technology to pull it. Yet Italy lags: electric cars are around 4.4% of new registrations, against 14% in Germany and France and 26% in the Netherlands (data updated 2022).

The blocker is not the technology. Surveys name range anxiety, the fear that an EV will not cover real daily needs, as the top barrier to adoption, and about half of Italian drivers put it as their top concern. However, the data says the opposite. An average EV on the market today covers more than 300 km on a charge, while up to 70% of Italian cars exceed 100 km on no more than two days a year. At least one driver in five already moves in a pattern an EV would cover today. The cars are ready but drivers do not know it.

So the real problem was never battery range, it was a perception gap. The question stopped being how to build an EV with more range, and became how to show drivers what their own mobility actually looks like, so they can see for themselves that the cars already available cover it. That reframing turned an environmental ambition into a service someone could use.

User goals

  • Find out whether an electric car suits my needs without any upfront investment.

Environmental goals

  • Accelerate EV adoption thereby decarbonising private transport.
  • Turn mobility data into value for energy, automotive, and public transport services.
Three Evvu screens turning a driver's own data into evidence: the charge left in the simulated electric car, the distances actually travelled over a month against its range, and the CO2 saved compared with the petrol car.

Approach

I started from human bias. My preliminary research (interviews and surveys) and the academic literature on EV adoption pointed the same way: users tend to overestimate their actual needs. That set the design problem. I had to measure a driver's real mobility and hand it back in a form that was hard to argue with.

The core method was a data‑driven digital twin. The two options people already had, self‑reporting and dealer consultancy, both inherit the user's own bias: you cannot answer a perception problem with a perceived answer. So I modelled an EV's behaviour against the driver's real trips instead. The app reads everyday GPS journeys, then replays each one through a virtual EV the user picks, showing live whether that trip would have been covered. Compatibility becomes something you watch happen on your own routes.

From concept to product, I worked in Lean Startup cycles, sharpened during the I3P incubation: build the smallest testable version, put it in front of real drivers, read what their data said back. I stayed close to the build rather than throwing specs over the wall: understanding what the GPS data could and could not support, what was cheap to test and what was expensive to get wrong, let us argue the right trade‑off on the same evidence.

Business design ran in parallel, because a tool that helps people but cannot sustain itself never moves a market. I framed Evvu as Software as a Service: free for drivers, while energy providers, car dealers and public administration licence the engine as an API and receive aggregated mobility data in return.

"Looking closely at how Italians drive today, with no change to infrastructure, 20% of cars would already be ready to go electric, but Italians do not know it. There is a real gap between the range and infrastructure a driver thinks they need and what they actually need."

Prof. Sergio Savaresi, Politecnico di Milano
How the digital twin works: GPS trips recorded by the driver's phone feed a virtual electric vehicle, whose behaviour is replayed on the real routes.

Solution

The strategic logic was to move the decision from persuasion to proof. Evvu does not try to talk anyone into going electric, it lets the car prove itself against the driver's own life. When the choice rests on personal evidence instead of a salesperson's promise, going electric stops being a leap of faith.

Using Evvu is simple. The user downloads the app, grants the location permissions, and picks the electric model they are curious about. Then the user drives as they always do, in the car they already own. In the background, Evvu builds a digital twin of that EV and runs it against the user's real mobility data, trip by trip, in live simulation. Next time the user opens the app, they see their own driving needs next to how the simulated electric car performed, and whether it would have kept up. The simulation also allows the user to compare the two vehicles in terms of emissions and fuel consumption.

The B2B layer exposes the same engine as an API for energy companies, dealers, manufacturers, and public administration, who embed it and get aggregated mobility data back. That aggregated data was the most strategic asset of all, especially for energy companies. Knowing the real routes that EV‑ready drivers already travel tells a utility exactly where new charging stations would pay off, on the corridors that matter rather than on a guess. Place the chargers there and you answer the last doubt a borderline driver still holds, where will I charge, before they even ask it. The same behavioural data that nudges one person toward an EV is what builds the infrastructure to convert them for good, which closes the loop back to the environmental goal that started the whole thing.

Evvu's ambition was to act as a change catalyst.
On one side, it was a tool to raise awareness amongst drivers, and on the other, a means of collecting data that would help stakeholders in electric vehicle chains to anticipate users' needs.

Impact

  1. From thesis to shipped product

    A functioning Evvu app went live on the App Store and Google Play, out of an MSc thesis graded 110/110 with honours. In an early test on a small pool of 50 users over three months, around 70% showed driving consumption fully compatible with an EV, an encouraging first signal for the core hypothesis ahead of wider testing.

  2. Selected for top‑tier incubation

    Evvu was admitted to I3P at Politecnico di Torino, one of Italy's leading university incubators, and entered the CTE NEXT Torino 2024 programme.

  3. Recognised by 3 awards

    Evvu won CTE NEXT Torino 2024 and Start Cup Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta 2024, and in 2025 Politecnico di Milano selected it among the top 20 Product Service System Design projects, marking the programme's 20th anniversary.

Reflection

Closing a bet on purpose is part of starting one

Evvu is the project I am proudest of, and not because of where it ended. It started as a thesis, but it grew because I decided to believe in it and bring two friends into the bet, fuelled by the wish to test myself against a real, complicated challenge rather than a tidy academic one. That choice is what pushed me past classic design and into the parts I had never owned before: business modelling, a financial plan, legal questions, data management, the technical reality of shipping.

The team eventually chose to wind Evvu down, but I do not read that as a failure. I had tested many avenues, validated the core hypothesis, shipped a real app, earned incubation and gathered experience across disciplines I would never have touched otherwise. Knowing when a bet has taught you what it can, and deciding to close it on purpose, turned out to be part of the same entrepreneurial discipline that got it started.